New Delhi, Days after the Centre told the Supreme Court that it won’t hold any dialogue with Kashmir’s separatist leaders, Defence Minister Arun Jaitley on Thursday again ruled out any talks with the separatists, at least for now.
“In this current atmosphere of violence, we will not hold talks with separatists who are instigating violence. Not for now,” he told TimesNow news channel.
Jaitley said the government will definitely talk to the people of Kashmir and would like to address their grievances.
Asked if this included Hurriyat, he said, “I am not saying that.”
Jaitley also said the NDA government would neither compromise with separatists nor with militants.
“As per as my views are concerned or of the government we will not compromise with the separatists. We will not compromise with militants. But as far as the average people of Jammu and Kashmir are concerned, we want them to be on our side because they are also suffering from militancy and violence,” Jaitley said.
“They must realise that their day-to-day life is disrupted by these kinds of elements,” he said.
Jaitley also defended Army’s Major Leetul Gogoi, who was involved in tying up a Kashmiri man to an army jeep in Budgam as a shield against stone-pelters. Gogoi has been awarded the Army Chief’s Commendation Card for “sustained efforts in counter insurgency operations.”
“To deal with a situation of this kind (stone pelting), subsequent political or media reactions can’t determine the military strategy. That has to be decided by the officer on the spot. If we are going to cripple our military officers in deciding as to what kind of strategy they must adopt at a given moment then I think we are playing with national security,” Jaitley said.
Defending Gogoi, Jaitley said the officer had the responsibility to save the lives of Election Commission officials and Indo-Tibetan Border Police officials as well as the crowd that had gathered.
“Now this officer uses his common sense at that stage and he manages to escape. How should a military officer deal with a situation of this kind? It was his duty to rescue the Election Commission officials and the ITBP,” Jaitley said.
“Should he have fired at the crowd? Was that a preferred option? Should he have created a stampede? Was that a preferred option? He used his discretion in the larger national interest in order to defuse the situation without causing any loss of life and property,” he said.
“I don’t think the officer really can be faulted for that. The other options would have been far worse,” he added. (IANS)